Gondolas—long associated with ski resorts and scenic tourist views—are quietly becoming one of the world’s most effective urban transit tools.
In cities where buses struggle with elevation and trains are too expensive or impractical, gondolas are proving to be more than just a quirky alternative. They’re fast, relatively cheap, require minimal ground disruption, and can bring transformative access to underserved communities.
The clearest example of this transformation? La Paz, Bolivia—a city that reimagined urban mobility by floating above it.
La Paz’s Mi Teleférico: The Gondola System That Defied Expectations
At first glance, La Paz doesn’t seem like a city where you’d expect world-class public transit. With under a million residents, it’s smaller and less economically dominant than Bolivia’s own Santa Cruz. But La Paz faced a challenge no bus or metro system could solve easily: extreme terrain.
Nestled in a steep canyon at altitudes between 9,000 and 12,000 feet, La Paz is dramatically split between elevation-based economic classes. Wealthier areas lie lower in the city, while working-class neighborhoods—especially the vast, densely populated El Alto—sit above on a plateau.
Connecting these two worlds was more than a matter of equity—it was a necessity.
Enter Mi Teleférico: a cable-propelled gondola network designed not for sightseeing, but commuting.
A Decade of Growth
What began in 2014 as a three-line pilot project has, in just ten years, become a 10-line network spanning 31 stations, carrying over 200,000 riders daily, and celebrating 520 million total passengers. Its rapid growth is stunning, but its engineering is even more so.
Gondolas glide over traffic, mountains, and informal settlements alike. They solve La Paz’s toughest problem—not congestion, but elevation—by treating it as an asset, not a hindrance.
And they do it cheaply: just $23 million per kilometer during its initial phase, a fraction of what metro lines cost in cities like Bogotá or Medellín.
Latin America’s Gondola Boom
La Paz didn’t invent gondola transit, nor was it the first to implement it.
That honor goes to Medellín, Colombia, which launched its Metrocable in 2004 to bridge the gap between the city’s flat center and hillside favelas. Like Mi Teleférico, Medellín’s system serves low-income areas and links them to more robust transit lines. Since its inception, employment is up, crime is down, and access to opportunity has expanded.
Cities across Latin America followed suit:
-
Caracas, Venezuela (2010)
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2011)
-
Cali, Colombia (2014)
-
Mexico City (2016 and now up to five lines)
Each system differs in layout and success, but they all share something critical:
-
Hilly topography
-
Rapid urban growth
-
Budget constraints
-
Unequal access to opportunity
Gondolas aren’t just filling gaps—they’re redefining how transit can serve sprawling, economically divided cities.
Gondolas Beyond Latin America: What Works and What Doesn’t
So, can gondolas work outside Latin America?
Yes—but only under the right conditions. Consider two contrasting European case studies.
Brest, France: A River-Spanning Success
In 2016, Brest launched a gondola to bridge a naval port area and the city center. A traditional bridge was estimated at $30–60 million due to ship clearance issues; the gondola? Just $20 million.
It now moves up to 1,200 passengers per hour during peak times, with ridership exceeding projections. Despite a few mechanical issues, the project is widely seen as a smart, cost-effective solution.
London, UK: A Tourism Trap Masquerading as Transit
Then there’s the Emirates Air Line—London’s attempt to integrate gondolas into the city’s broader transit network. It cost over $90 million, but just four commuters used it regularly during peak hours in its first year.
Why did it fail?
-
The route wasn’t transit-relevant for most commuters.
-
Alternatives (like the train) were faster and cheaper.
-
It was priced and marketed like a tourist attraction.
Despite its presence on Tube maps, the system has become a cautionary tale of flashy infrastructure without clear utility.
What Makes Gondola Transit Work?
Gondola systems thrive under very specific conditions. Here’s what matters most:
Pros:
-
Low capital cost (as little as $20–30 million/km)
-
Quick installation timelines (2–3 years vs. a decade for metros)
-
Minimal ground disruption
-
Ideal for steep or rugged geography
-
Energy-efficient and quiet
-
Predictable travel times, immune to traffic
Cons:
-
Limited surge capacity (cabins can’t be added during peak hours)
-
Lower overall capacity than trains
-
Vulnerable to high winds and weather disruptions
-
Higher maintenance needs for daily use vs. seasonal ski resorts
In short: gondolas don’t beat trains or buses across the board. But in hilly, low-income, traffic-congested cities where those modes are impractical or unaffordable?
They’re often the only viable solution.
Induced Access, Induced Demand
Transit isn’t just about moving people faster—it’s about changing lives.
In La Paz, commuters using Mi Teleférico cut daily commute times by up to 75%, giving them more time for work, study, or family. Informal neighborhoods now have formal access. The disabled and elderly have a dignified, accessible way to travel.
Studies even show net economic benefits for riders, as much as $0.58 per ride, when time saved and opportunity access are factored in. And despite no ongoing subsidies, the system breaks even—a rarity in global public transit.
Looking Ahead: Gondolas in Paris, LA, Amsterdam, and Beyond
Urban gondolas are gaining traction outside their Latin American strongholds:
-
Paris is building a system to cross a rail yard and highway where extending a Metro line would’ve been too expensive.
-
Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Amsterdam are in various stages of planning their own cable-car-based systems.
Each case tests whether gondolas can serve as more than just connectors—and become anchors of modern urban mobility.
FAQ: Urban Gondola Systems
Q: How much does a gondola system cost?
A: Typically between $20–30 million/km, far cheaper than subways ($100m+/km) or even BRT systems in some cases.
Q: Are gondolas accessible to people with disabilities?
A: Yes—urban gondolas use detachable cabins that slow or stop for boarding, making them highly accessible.
Q: How fast are gondolas compared to buses or trains?
A: Gondolas travel 15–24 km/h, but skip traffic and elevation, making actual trip times competitive or faster in hilly areas.
Q: Do gondolas work in flat cities?
A: Generally no—unless there’s a barrier like a river or rail yard. Flat cities are better served by buses or trains.
Q: Are gondolas environmentally friendly?
A: Yes—electric-powered, low-emission, and often quieter than other transit options.
Final Takeaway
Urban gondolas aren’t a silver bullet. They’re not meant to replace trains, buses, or bike lanes.
But in a unique mix of topography, economic constraints, and sprawling growth, they’ve filled an urgent gap that no other transit method could.
They connect the disconnected. They climb what others can’t. And in cities like La Paz, they do more than move people—they change lives.
