Introduction: The Illusion of an Ending
Four months have passed since the fall of Bashar al-Assad, and Syria remains a cauldron of unresolved conflict, fragile hope, and deeply entrenched mistrust. The headlines may have declared the civil war “over,” but anyone who’s followed Syria closely knows better. What we’re witnessing is not peace, but a liminal space—one where the line between war and its aftermath is blurred beyond recognition.
Today’s Syria is a study in brutal contradictions. Sectarian massacres, the resurgence of insurgencies, and foreign interventions coexist alongside diplomatic breakthroughs, new governmental structures, and a citizenry yearning for peace. To understand Syria now is to accept complexity. Simplistic narratives—victory, defeat, war, peace—no longer apply.
A Nation Still at War?
Did the Syrian Civil War end with Assad’s departure? The answer is simultaneously yes, no, and maybe.
-
Yes, because Assad, the symbol of tyranny, is gone.
-
No, because violence—particularly sectarian and insurgent in nature—continues.
-
Maybe, because Syria is caught in a transitional state, neither at peace nor fully at war.
Latakia and Tartus, strongholds of the Alawite minority, became epicenters of horrific violence in March 2025. The massacres that unfolded there—acts of ethnic cleansing against Alawites—were not random, but calculated explosions of retributive fury, aimed at those perceived to be Assad loyalists.
Over 1,600 civilians were killed, most of them Alawites. Despite the government’s attempts to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators, the incident remains a stain on Syria’s transitional regime and a harrowing reminder of how fragile the new order is.
The Anatomy of Insurgency and Retribution
The violence in Latakia and Tartus didn’t erupt in a vacuum. Regime loyalists—remnants of Assad’s security forces—had been staging ambushes and assassinations since December. These groups, reportedly under the direction of Major General Suhail al-Hassan, exploited the transitional government’s lack of centralized military control.
This decentralization stems from the very makeup of Syria’s new armed forces—a fusion of ideologically diverse former rebel groups and militias. Their motivations vary wildly, and many answer to local commanders, not the central government.
Some of these factions were implicated in the March massacres, including the infamous Suleiman Shah Brigade and the Hamza Division. Fueled by decades of resentment, extremist rhetoric, and online disinformation, the bloodshed spiraled. The result: a week of carnage so profound it echoed the worst chapters of the civil war.
The Role—and Failure—of the Transitional Government
The Syrian Transitional Government has made repeated assertions that it neither sanctioned nor facilitated the atrocities. While most international observers have agreed, the government’s inability to prevent or swiftly stop the violence is damning on its own.
Yet, removing this leadership would create a dangerous vacuum. There is no clear, competent alternative. The government’s flaws are significant, but the alternatives are often worse—chaotic, fragmented, or outright hostile to democratic reform.
Foreign nations like France have issued stark warnings: no international support without accountability. This conditional diplomacy reflects a broader reality—the world is watching, but it’s also wary.
Continued Chaos and the Rise of Old Enemies
Syria’s woes extend beyond sectarian violence. The Islamic State (ISIS), once thought dismantled, has returned with alarming vigor. Using guerrilla tactics, extortion, and targeted assassinations, they’re destabilizing large swaths of the northeast.
A recent agreement between the SDF and Damascus is a notable bright spot. It promises joint security, a shared civil infrastructure, and national integration. But it also heightens tensions with Turkey, whose proxies continue clashing with Kurdish forces.
Meanwhile, Israel’s ongoing occupation of southern Syria—framed as a buffer against Iranian influence—has drawn global condemnation. Early airstrikes may have prevented worse outcomes, such as the deployment of chemical weapons, but the long-term consequences are destabilizing. Local Druze communities are split—some welcoming Israeli protection, others resisting what they view as a land grab.
Positive Signs and Real Governance
Amid all this chaos, Syria has seen signs of authentic progress.
-
The announcement of a new inclusive cabinet under transitional President Ahmed al-Shar was met with cautious optimism. The cabinet includes Alawites, Christians, Kurds, and independents, with a majority having no link to extremist groups.
-
A new interim constitution has created a foundation for separation of powers and judicial independence.
-
Infrastructure repair has begun. Oil tankers are docking. International flights have resumed. Humanitarian aid is flowing in greater volumes.
-
Public sentiment, according to The Economist, is surprisingly optimistic:
-
70% of Syrians feel hopeful about the future.
-
80% report feeling freer than under Assad.
-
80% approve of Shar’s leadership so far.
-
The Sanctions Conundrum
Sanctions remain a critical obstacle to recovery. Meant to contain Assad, they now cripple the very government trying to rebuild in his absence. Syria is frozen out of global finance, unable to attract investment, and thus unable to pay civil servants or security forces.
This economic stranglehold threatens to undo fragile progress. As international policymakers weigh their options, the risk is clear: inaction could turn the promise of reconstruction into a self-fulfilling prophecy of collapse.
Conclusion: The Road Forward—Narrow, But Still There
Syria stands on a knife’s edge. The atrocities of March cannot be undone, and reconciliation will take years. But the path forward—though steep, narrow, and perilous—still exists.
The world must recognize that rebuilding Syria isn’t just a moral imperative—it’s a strategic one. A fractured Syria will not stay contained. The cost of failure will be paid in regional instability, global refugee flows, and further radicalization.
There is still time to choose a different path. To lift sanctions conditionally. To invest in the Syrian people. To support, not sabotage, Syria’s only viable chance at peace.
Because if Syria’s next decade mirrors its last, it won’t be because peace was impossible.
It’ll be because this moment—this one right now—was wasted.
FAQ: Rebuilding Syria in 2025
Q: Is the Syrian Civil War really over?
A: Not officially. While Assad has fallen and a transitional government is in place, sectarian violence, insurgencies, and foreign occupations persist.
Q: Who is leading Syria now?
A: Transitional President Ahmed al-Shar, a former rebel leader, currently oversees the government. His inclusive cabinet has been cautiously welcomed.
Q: What happened in Latakia and Tartus?
A: Over 1,600 Alawite civilians were massacred in a week-long spree of ethnic violence, largely by factions aligned with the transitional government.
Q: Is ISIS still a threat?
A: Yes. ISIS is waging an asymmetric insurgency, particularly in northeast Syria, targeting Kurdish forces and trying to regain influence.
Q: What role is Israel playing in Syria?
A: Israel occupies parts of southern Syria, claiming to protect Druze communities and prevent Iranian influence, but its presence is highly controversial.
Q: Are Syrians optimistic about the future?
A: Surprisingly, yes. Polls suggest that a majority of Syrians feel freer and hopeful about rebuilding their country despite the ongoing violence.
